Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Case Study: Contaminated Sites

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

PRIVATE DEVELOPER: DESK APPRAISAL OF FORMER MIXED INDUSTRIAL SITE, Derbyshire, England

A desk study was undertaken of a mixed industrial site, including part of a gas works, a former lead-acid battery manufacturer, timber mill and former cotton mill.  Anecdotal data was researched via archives and interviews with former site workers.  The geology was described from published and limited site-specific data.

The site hydrogeology comprised a deep valley incised into outcropping limestone, overlain by thin alluvium.  Shallow unconfined groundwater was in hydraulic continuity with a nearby class 1A river.  The site was split into five areas with similar historical activities/contaminants.

An initial qualitative risk assessment characterised the risk to the proposed site re-development.

Recommendations were made for a detailed investigation program.

Stuart Jeffries
Hydrosolutions Pty Ltd

Click here to see a project summary
Click here for details of our capabilities in Contaminated Sites
Click here to send us details of your requirements
Click here for other example Contaminated Site projects

Contam12


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Case Study: Contaminated Sites

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

LEADING US PHOTOCHEMICAL MANUFACTURER

Site appraisal, photochemical manufacturing plant, Runcorn, United Kingdom

An assessment of site conditions at a photochemical manufacturing plant was undertaken.  Historical
site operations and former waste disposal practices were examined through an audit process including
staff anecdotal interviews and walkover surveys.

The hydrogeological setting of the area was assessed to be highly sensitive, with the site overlying thin surficial deposits above the major regional Triassic Sandstone aquifer, with downgradient public water supply bores.

A detailed sampling, analysis and health and safety plan was prepared.  Site investigation
comprised a soil vapour survey, trial pit and soil & groundwater monitoring bores.

Soil and groundwater contaminants were identified associated with the 40-year manufacturing of
photochemicals, and also previous munitions manufacture at the site, including inorganic, metals and
organic contaminants associated with photochemcial production.

The natural attenuation capacity of the surficial deposits was examined, and concluded to be insufficient to prevent the likelihood of contaminant migration.

Recommendations were made for further work to determine potential liabilities associated with the identified site conditions.

Stuart Jeffries
Hydrosolutions Pty Ltd

Click here to see a project summary
Click here for details of our capabilities in Contaminated Sites
Click here to send us details of your requirements
Click here for other example Contaminated Site projects

Contam11


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Friday, February 26, 2016

Case Study: Contaminated Site(Environmental) Audit

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT,Private Developer
Former Market Gardens, Woodvale.

A former market garden area is proposed for residential redevelopment.
Consultants have been appointed by the owner to investigate any impacts from the  former site usage.  A voluntary audit is being undertaken of the work.

A stage 1 Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) has identified the following potential impacts:

  • Former Market Garden areas, used for vegetables, crops and grapes, which  may have had organo-chlorine/phosphate (OCP) and herbicide/insecticides and fertiliser applications
  • Mechanical workshops: use of Paris Green wood preservatives, fuels, oils, degreasers.
  • Sheds used for paint storage.
  • Former poultry operation: nutrients, formaldehyde (disinfectant)
  • On-site fill and waste disposal
  • Run-off to soak wells and sumps
  • Abandoned vehicles
  • Potential use of asbestos in fencing and roofs of on-site buildings.

A detailed Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) will by the Consultant in cooperation with the auditor to guide a stage 2 Detailed Site Investigation (DSI) to identify any impacts from these sources.
Stuart Jeffries
Hydrosolutions Pty Ltd

Click here to see a project summary
Click here for details of our capabilities in Environmental Auditing
Click here to send us details of your requirements
Click here for other example Environmental Audit projects

(Audit 17)


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Newsletter: Monitored Natural Attenuation

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

MONITORED NATURAL ATTENUATION

MNA (also “intrinsic or passive” remediation) may be defined as naturally occurring physical/ chemical/ biological process/es that reduce concentration & mass of polluting substances in groundwater (DEC, 2004) and soil.  MNA is a process of field monitoring & laboratory analysis to confirm that the remediation is occurring as expected.  MNA processes can include:
• Biodegradation (consumption by microbes & conversion into less/ non-harmful substances)
• Physical processes (e.g. adsorption (soil adherence), evaporation etc)
• Chemical processes (e.g. hydrolysis, precipitation, cation exchange, oxidation/ reduction, aerobic/ anaerobic degradation, fermentation/ reductive dechlorination/  dehydrohalogenation)
• Dilution (mixing with unpolluted water)- non-destructive!.

However, MNA must:
• Demonstrate a reduction in mass/ concentration/ toxicity occurs.
• Be sufficiently rapid to prevent impact on receptors & minimise plume expansion
• Achieve remedial goals within one generation, ~30 years.
• Include monitoring over 2-3 years+ that MNA is occurring
• A contingency plan if MNA is not achieving remedial goals.

Typically MNA is part of a remedial strategy which includes removal of the source (e.g. leaking tanks/ PSH on the water table) & may be used with other active strategies (e.g. air sparging/ vacuum extraction/ oxidation agents etc)

A Four Stage Process (WA DER):

1) Screening Stage (Assess Viability)
• A soil & groundwater investigation establishing contaminant source, extent/ nature of the plume, aquifer characteristics & groundwater geochemistry
• Identification of sensitive gw receptors
• A feasibility assessment of MNA for the identified site characteristics, (e.g. Low to High)

2) Demonstration Stage (quantitative demonstration of the rate of MNA)
• (Primary evidence): historical monitoring data of concentration decreases with time/ distance
• (Secondary): geochemical mass balance assessment and/or observed data for a shrinking or stable plume.
• (Tertiary): Laboratory demonstration of degradation processes.
This may require additional site investigation work.

3) Assessment Stage (Is MNA an acceptable remedial option?)
• Identify receptors to be protected, remedial targets to be achieved, & a remedial timescale)
• Modelling of the MNA process/es & aquifer environment, including predictive scenarios
• Reporting of the assessment results to DER

Following acceptance of MNA as a suitable remedial option:

4) Implementation
• Design of a monitoring program (Sampling & Analysis Plan)
• Monitoring reports submitted to DER
• Recommendations whether remedial goals are achieved, or on-going monitoring is required.

Adopted from DoE 2004 (Use of MNA for Gw Remediation)

Advantages & Disadvantages:

Advantages:
• Transformation into innocuous by-products (e.g. CO2, ethene, H2O)
• Relatively non-intrusive, allowing ongoing use of infrastructure
• Uses natural process/es
• No waste production
• Lower energy use/ emissions

Disadvantages:
• Longer time-frames to remediate
• Longer monitoring periods
• Complex site characterisation
• Affected by environmental changes (e.g. renewed mobility)
• Secondary toxicity (of transformed chemicals, e.g. TCE>VC)

Typical Applications:
• Hydrocarbon contaminated sites (e.g. service stations/ underground storage tanks/ fuel farms, for TRH, BTEX, PAHs)- Chlorinated hydrocarbons (e.g. solvents)
• Landfill leachate impacts (e.g. NVOCs, NH4, Cl, phenols, OCs, PAHs etc)
• Non-point sources (e.g. OCPs)

Useful References:
www.claire.co.uk?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss (SIReN)
www.sandia.gov/eesector/gs/gc/na/mnahome.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss (US government MNA Toolbox)

Stuart Jeffries
HydroSolutions Pty Ltd


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Case Study: Contaminated land

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

Major Chemical Manufacturer, United Kingdom

Appraisal of contamination issues, chlor-alkali and organo chlorine manufacturing site, United Kingdom.

An assessment of groundwater contamination and environmental sensitivity issues was undertaken at the company’s Merseyside Operations.

The site is the largest chlor-alkali and organo-chlorine (OC) chemical manufacturing site in the UK.

Chemical manufacturing commenced in the 1840’s, and has included saponification, chlor-alkalis, caustic soda, bleach,copper, hydrochloric and sulfuric acids, OC solvents,and more recently chloro-fluorocarbons (CFCs).  Other contaminants may also be present as by-products or catalysts used in chemical production processes or waste products.

Soil, surface water and groundwater impacts have resulted from the historical operations.

The study reviewed the sensitivity of the hydrogeological setting, and identified potential contaminant migration routes to impact regional groundwater quality, surface water quality in the adjacent Weston Canal, and potentially marine water quality.

Recommendations were made for a comprehensive site investigation program based on common chemical manufacturing areas and likely contaminant sources.

Stuart Jeffries
Hydrosolutions Pty Ltd

Click here to see a project summary
Click here for details of our capabilities in Contaminated Sites
Click here to send us details of your requirements
Click here for other example Contaminated Site projects

Contam10


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Case Study: Environmental Audit

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

Major RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT, (Quattro), former Queens Park, City of Canning, Western Australia

A former residential estate in Queens Park, Cannington, is being redeveloped for ongoing residential use.  Consultants have been appointed to undertake investigation of impacts arising from the former
residential development and it’s subsequent demolition.  A Contaminated Site Audit (CSA) is being undertaken on behalf of the site owner, to support an application for rezoning at a higher residential density.

The former residences have been demolished.  Site impacts have been identified including:

  • organo-chlorine/phosphate (OCP) herbicides in soils beneath the former footings
  • potential metals, hydrocarbons and nutrients in former septic systems, and
  • asbestos in/on soils from the removal of fencing.

The area will developed in three stages. An initial trial area has been remediated and is currently undergoing additional validation works.  Two further stages are currently being investigated, including soil
and potential groundwater impacts.

A Site Management Plan (SMP) is in development for the remaining stages.

A voluntary Site Audit Report (SAR) will be prepared for each stage to accompany consultant reports and to provide recommendations for appropriate site classification to the Department of Environmental Regulation (DER).

The Site was a finalist in the 2010 Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA) national awards for environmental excellence.

Stuart Jeffries
Hydrosolutions Pty Ltd

Click here to see a project summary
Click here for details of our capabilities in Environmental Auditing
Click here to send us details of your requirements
Click here for other example Environmental Audit projects

(Audit 16)


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Monday, February 15, 2016

Case Study: Environmental Audit

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

Major RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT, (Quattro), former Queens Park, City of Canning

A former residential estate in Queens Park, Cannington, is being redeveloped for ongoing residential use.  Consultants have been appointed to undertake investigation of impacts arising from the former residential development and it’s subsequent demolition.  A Contaminated Site Audit (CSA) is being undertaken on
behalf of the site owner, to support an application for rezoning at a higher residential density.

The former residences, which incorporated asbestos containing material (ACM) have been demolished.  Site impacts have been identified including organo-chlorine/ phosphate (OCP) herbicides in soils
beneath the former footings, potential metals, hydrocarbons and nutrients in former septic systems, and asbestos in/on soils from the removal of fencing.

The area will developed in four stages:

  • An initial trial area has been remediated and is currently undergoing additional
    validation works.
  • Three further stages are currently being investigated, including soil
    and potential groundwater impacts.

A Site Management Plan (SMP) is in development for the remaining stages.

A voluntary Site Audit Report (SAR) will be prepared for each stage to accompany consultant reports and to provide recommendations for appropriate site classification to the Department of Environmental Regulation (DER).

Stuart Jeffries
Hydrosolutions Pty Ltd

Click here to see a project summary
Click here for details of our capabilities in Environmental Auditing
Click here to send us details of your requirements
Click here for other example Environmental Audit projects

(Audit 16)


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Newsletter: Water Source Protection

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

A PERIODIC NEWSLETTER COMPILED FOR HYDROGEOLOGICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS IN W.A. MINING
& RESOURCE COMPANIES
WATER SOURCE PROTECTION

Protecting Public Drinking Water Source Areas (PDWSAs)
PDWSAs proclaimed by the Department of Water (DoW) are areas where stormwater run-off & seepage/ infiltration is stored above/ below ground & used to supply community drinking water needs.

Water Source Protection Plans
DoW prepares Water Source Protection Plans (WSPP) for PDWSAs which define water source/s (surface/ groundwater), catchment areas, & landuse management within specified priority (1-3) areas:
• P1: source protection is the prime beneficial landuse
• P2: no increased risk of pollution from existing landuse
• P3: risk minimisation to water source from existing landuse/s
• Wellhead Protection Zone (WHPZ): circle radius 500m in P1, 300m in P2 & P3 areas
• Reservoir Protection Zones: 2km from high water mark
Compatible/ incompatible landuses are defined for each zone. E.g. P1 incompatible landuses include animal husbandry, intensive agriculture, waste/ chemical storage & almost all commercial/ industrial development (DoE 2004). Some countries also specify sanitary protection zones as 50 to 60-day ‘time of travel’ areas to allow die-out of pathogens.

Source Protection Policy in Western Australia
The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (NHMRC 2004) outlines a ‘catchment to consumer’ multiple barrier risk based management approach to the provision, supply & protection of water sources:

• Selection of an appropriate, safe, high quality water source: are alternative source/s within higher natural protective barrier/s available (e.g. confined groundwater)?
• Effective catchment control: what landuse controls are available within the catchment? If none then monitoring is required as a minimum. Are existing landuses compatible with source protection?
• Protection Buffer Zones: define appropriate landuse management areas.
• Risk Assessment: of potential contaminants within the catchment
• Catchment Protection Strategies:
o Education (of landusers)
o Surveillance (monitoring)
o Enforcement: (responsibilities)
o Emergency response: to specific events (e.g. failure of ADW guidelines/ spillage etc)  • Reporting: management, occurrences/ monitoring etc
• Treatment/ disinfection:      requirements & performance monitoring
• Maintenance: e.g. of the distribution/ storage system

Private Drinking Water Supples
WQPN41 (DoW 2006) provides guidance applicable to rural dwellings, remote communities, mining camps & isolated sites on risks to water sources, waste disposal, options for protection, & quality testing.

Sources: Department of Environment & Conservation, Dept of Water, WA, NHMRC 2004

HydroSolutions Pty Ltd
We are a specialist  hydrogeological consultancy providing expert services including investigation, potable & process resource development & dewatering.  Our environmental capabilities include contaminated site investigation, auditing, remediation & risk assessment – qualitative/ quantitative, health, & ecological.

www.hydrosolutions.com.au?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss
Broadband NetMeeting conferencing available for remote sites.


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Case Study: Environmental Audit

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

INDUSTRIAL RE-DEVELOPMENT, Forrestfield, Western Australia

Part of a former railway marshalling yard in Forrestfield, Western Australia has been redeveloped as a new, high quality industrial estate.  Parts of the adjacent marshalling yard have been impacted by  historical
operations; identified areas of environmental concern (AECs) include diesel spillages, waste  disposal operations, effluent disposal, chemical use and imported ballast.

A Site remedial action plan (RAP) was developed in 2001 to address these issues, and some remedial work have been undertaken.

Some AECs are located within the new  industrial estate.  In order to obtain a site classification that the land is suitable for industrial use from the Department of Environmental Regulation (DER), the owner has agreed to undertake an initial investigation to determine whether groundwater quality beneath the estate has been impacted.

AECs have been located on the ground, and a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) prepared for the initial groundwater investigation, with the objectives of:

  • Identify AECs located within the estate
  • Assess which AECs have been successfully remediated in line with the earlier RAP
  • Determine groundwater quality up and downgradient of the identified AECs.

A Mandatory Audit Report (MAR) will be prepared to accompany the consultant report to DER
including a recommendation for appropriate site classification and posible furtehr work to rectify the site and make it suitable for ongoing industrial use.

Western Australia
Stuart Jeffries

Click here to see a project summary
Click here for details of our capabilities in Environmental Auditing
Click here to send us details of your requirements
Click here for other example Environmental Audit projects

Audit 15


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Case Study: Hydrogeology

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

BHP BILLITON IRON ORE PTY
Redmont Railcamp Potable Water Source Protection Plan, Pilbara, Western Australia

A source protection plan was developed for the potable water abstraction bores supplying Redmont
railcamp, consistent with Department of  Water and Water Corporation guidelines.

Raw water is obtained from two bores completed within a weathered pegmatite associated with the current
course of the Coonarie Creek.

A numerical groundwater model was constructed using FLOWPATH covering the groundwater and surface
water catchments supplying the aquifer.

Time of travel zones were defined including:

  • 60day Source Protection Area (SPA) to provide a sanitary protection zone
  • 365day SPA, equivalent to a wellhead protection area priority 2 area
  • Total catchment area.

Incompatible landuses were identified and an initial risk assessment to the raw water source was undertaken.

Recommendations were made to undertake a review of the water treatment and distribution system
consistent with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines 2004.

Stuart Jeffries
Hydrosolutions Pty Ltd

Click here to see a project summary
Click here for details of our capabilities in Hydrogeology/ Groundwater
Click here to send us details of your requirements
Click here for other example Hydrogeological projects

Hydro21


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

February 2016

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

DSI of acquisition land at an operational Nickel refinery


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au

Friday, January 1, 2016

Article: Contaminant Hydrogeology

http://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png

THIS ARTICLE IS A CASE STUDY OF HISTORICAL PROJECTS HYDROSOLUTIONS HAVE WORKED ON.

Contaminant Hydrogeology

Groundwater is the water contained within porous or fractured media below ground.  Hydrogeology may be defined as the study of groundwater or water accumulation and flow beneath the ground surface.  Contaminant hydrogeology may be defined as the study of the occurrence, impact and management of groundwater contamination.

The quality of groundwater is dependent on the dissolved or phase separated chemistry, biological composition, and also the physical state of the water.  Groundwater quality varies naturally, dependent on its recharge water, interaction with surface waters (via seepage recharge or groundwater discharge), the dissolution of chemicals within the rock matrix along it’s flow path,  membrane filtration effects, mixing of different water types and other natural chemical or physical processes  etc.  Groundwater contaminant hydrogeological quality can also be profoundly impacted by anthropogenic activities, including et al:

• Abstraction: e.g. drawdown altering the redox chemistry/ de-saturating overlying layers allowing oxidation of previously reduced minerals/ saline intrusion etc
• Spillages/ leakages of stored chemicals (e.g. underground storage tanks/ pipelines conveying for instance hydrocarbons/ in-organic chemicals
• Recharge operations: infiltration basins from road runoff, seepages from stormwater compensation basins/ aquifer storage and recovery operations etc
• Waste disposal operations: e.g. seepage of leachate from landfills, deliberate deep-(liquid) waste injection
• Heat exchange operations (e.g. reinjection of boiler blow-down water etc)

.A contaminant hydrogeology assessment will need to consider all potential influences which may affect groundwater quality

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Groundwater Contaminants
We will consider the common contaminant groups which are normally considered in contaminant hydrogeology studies.  Whether groundwater is contaminated is often dependent on the environmental value or beneficial use of the resource, either at the point of monitoring or at the point of discharge (e.g. wetland/ lake/ surface water body or abstraction bore).  Australian Federal and State Government agencies have set specifications regarding current best environmental practices to protect environmental values and these are known as environmental guidelines. Contaminant hydrogeology assessments involve identifying the presence of chemicals at sufficient concentration which may render the groundwater unfit for use for a specific purpose; this may happen naturally (e.g. Totals Dissolved Solids > 1,000mg/L renders water unfit for human drinking, although sheep may tolerate up to 13,000mg/L). For human drinking water, the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines specifies c103 physical and chemical characteristics with health-based or aesthetic guideline values which are maximum permitted concentrations, with additional guideline values for pesticides, bacteria and viruses.  The Australian & New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality includes trigger values for toxicants for ecosystem protection, irrigation, stock rearing, aquaculture, recreational water (e.g. swimming), industrial use (e.g. boiler supplies), and also for sediment quality.

In contaminant hydrogeology, groundwater is examined for contaminants which may include the following common species et al:

• Aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g. benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (‘BTEX’ components of petroleum et al), Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), e.g. benzo(a)pyrene/ naphthalene
• Oxygenated hydrocarbons (e.g. acetic acid, methanol, phenol, MTBE)
• Chlorinated or halogenated hydrocarbons (e.g. 1,2 DCE, 1,1,2 TCE (degreasers/ solvents)
• Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
• Other hydrocarbons including alkanes (e.g. paraffin’s) & Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) from fuels
• Organochlorine/phosphate (OCP/OPP) pesticides & herbicides (e.g. Atrazine, dieldrin etc.)
• Metals: e.g. Al, As, Cd, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mg, Mn, Ni, Se, Zn etc.)
• Nutrients: e.g. Total nitrogen, nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia (NH3), Total phosphorous, filterable reactive phosphorous, soluble reactive phosphorous
• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), e.g. PCE, VC.
• Biological contaminants – E coli, coliform etc resulting from septic tanks, raw sewerage overflow et al
• Radioactivity
• Emerging contaminants

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Contaminant Behaviour

In studies of contaminant hydrogeology we observe contaminants behaving differently within groundwater systems based on their physical or chemical nature.  For instance hydrocarbons may be hydrophobic, or water ‘hating’, and may be immiscible or insoluble in water, forming separate phases with water (non-aqueous phase liquids or NAPLs).  Poorly soluble chemicals may form emulsions, while others may be taken partially into solution as dissolved phases dependent on their solubility.  Chemicals which are less dense than water (‘LNAPLs’, e.g. hydrocarbons) tend to float on the water table, forming a distinct layer which represents a continuous source of dissolved phase contaminant due to groundwater underflow).  Chemicals denser than water (‘DNAPLs’, e.g. 1,2 DCE) tend to sink through the water column, and may pool at the base of aquifers upon lower permeability layers; these may also form continuous sources of dissolved contamination.

Inorganic chemicals may be taken into solution within groundwater, dependent on their solubility.  In studies of contaminant hydrogeology we also observe ‘conservative’ chemicals (e.g. chloride) which do not react with the aquifer environment and may migrate at the same rate as the groundwater flow. Reactive chemicals may be sorbed onto the aquifer matrix materials, or be desorbed when the concentration in the influent groundwater is less than the sorbed concentration, and hence will migrate more slowly (i.e. be ‘retarded’) relative to groundwater flow.  Other physico-chemical reactions can also retard (slow) the solute movement relative to the groundwater flow rate including advective dispersion (tortuosity of the flow path causing lateral and transverse spreading), cation exchange between solute and matrix, precipitation out of solution as particulate matter which may be liable to filtration effects, and sorbsion onto ferrous iron (FeII) and organic carbon fractions et al.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Aquifer Environment

Contaminant hydrogeology behaviour is also affected by the aquifer environment for e.g.;
• Porous media:  occurs within granular media such as sands, resulting in dispersion as the solute travels through the media, and the potential for increased sorption onto the high surface area of the material. Capillary pressure within the vadose (unsaturated) zone may lead to the retention of contaminants within soils which may continue to leach to the underlying groundwater.
• Limestone – likely to possess secondary porosity due to the formation of solution voids by dissolution of the rock matrix during mildly acidic groundwater flow.
• Sandstone: –  may have both high granular porosity and also flow through fractures of secondary features such as bedding planes.
• Other competent (strong) rocks form fractures during deformation, such as basalt, although it may possess porosity as a result of vesicles or gas pockets formed during cooling.
• Massive hard rocks (such as granite) may also possess fractures which may dominate the groundwater flow mechanism, although again granites may possess granular porosity due to weathering of feldspars etc.

In contaminant hydrogeology studies it is also necessary to check for the presence of fractures which provide high permeability conduits through which groundwater may flow preferentially, often at very high flow rates in comparison with intergrannular flow.  Conversely, partially or non-interconnected fractures may provide points of contaminant retention due to high capillary pressures.

Once contaminants are present in groundwater, they may persist for long periods due to favourable conditions for their preservation, such limited or no evaporation, no photodegradation, little or no oxygen, limited microbial activity due to lack of nutrients/ oxygen or sorbsion onto aquifer materials etc. Conversely, some contaminants are susceptible to natural attenuation processes.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Hydrocarbons

Hydrocarbons are widely used as fuels (e.g. petroleum, diesel, paraffin, heavy fuel oil, aviation fuels), as lubricants (oils), as chemical intermediaries, and coal tars for e.g. bitumen.  Waste oil is generated from mechanical servicing.  In studies of contaminant hydrogeology we observe that hydrocarbons typically enter the groundwater environment from leaking storage tanks or pipelines, or spillages.  Most hydrocarbons may be biodegraded by naturally occurring bacteria which consume the carbon within the contaminant as an energy source in the presence of oxygen as an electron-acceptor.  BTEX compounds within petroleum are highly susceptible to this process, although BTEX constitutes less than 25% of diesel, with the remaining predominant alkanes having little susceptibility and therefore persisting within the aquifer.  When oxygen has been consumed, biodegradation processes can still occur using other chemicals present as electron acceptors, such as in order) nitrate (nitrification), manganese reduction (MnIV),   ferric iron reduction (FeIII), sulfate reduction (SO4) and methanogenesis (acetate).  As contaminant Hydrogeologists we find that Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) may be an important remedial management technique in these circumstances.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Chlorinated Solvents

In contaminant hydrogeology assessments chlorinated solvents (CS) may also be naturally biodegraded primarily as a growth substrate but only under specific redox conditions, as either electron donors (contaminant is oxidised either aerobically or anaerobically) or acceptors (contaminant is reduced via halorespiration (a biological reductive dechlorination process where the CS is consumed by bacteria as a substrate, with hydrogen (present from fermentation of organic compounds) as the electron donor).  An example is the reductive dechlorination of PCE to TCE to DCE to VC.  Daughter products of biological degradation (e.g. VC, from the parent PCE) are often however toxic to the bacteria, while VC is a known carcinogen to humans (i.e. it is more toxic than the parent).  Cometabolism, where bacteria gain carbon & energy from a primary substrate produces enzymes which are also important degradation agents for CS, e.g. cometabolic oxidation of TCE under aerobic conditions, with oxygen as the electron acceptor and methane as the electron donor, with TCE degraded via enzymes present for methane oxidation.  However, methane and oxygen are not common in large quantities and hence cometabolic oxidation is not an important degradation process in many CS plumes.  Reductive dechlorination may also occur anaerobically via cometabolism, although this is often a slow and incomplete process.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Organo-Chlorine and Organo-Phosphate Pesticides (OCP/OPP) and Herbicides
In contaminant hydrogeology assessments, examples of OCPs include

• Cyclodienes: e.g. aldrin, chlordane, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor
• Chlorinated benzenes: e.g. hexachlorobenzene (HCB)
• Cyclohexanes: e.g. hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)
• Dichlorodiphenylethanes: e.g. DDT/DDD/DDE (i.e. metabolic products of DDT)
• Trichlorophenols (2,4,5 & 2,4,6).

Their use includes fungicides and bactericides.  Many have been banned (e.g. DDT etc) due to concerns over their persistence (resistance to degradation) and toxicity.  They may enter groundwater from run-off, as leachate from disposal to landfills or incinerators, or from manufacturing sites, which need to be assessed in contaminant hydrogeology studies.

Many are SVOCs and may partition into the soil gas or sorb onto soils.  They may bioaccumulate (i.e. accumulate within an organism) in fish and animals, and since they are soluble in fat, may accumulate in foods and entre the food chain in humans via milk, fish, meat, potable (drinking) water and via inhalation of soil gases.

In contaminant hydrogeology assessments, common examples of OPPs include: parathion, malathion, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, dichlorvos, and azinophos methyl.  OPPs are esters of phosphoric acid.  In addition to their use as herbicides/ pesticides, OPPs are used as solvents, plasticisers, extreme pressure lubricants & as nerve gases.  OPPs degrade rapidly (in comparison to OCPs) in the environment via hydrolysis on exposure to sunlight and air in soils, but have a greater acute (i.e. short-term) toxicity (e.g. neurotoxins), and their daughter products may be more toxic than the parent compounds.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Metals and Non-metallic Elements

In contaminant hydrogeology assessments, metal concentrations and their stable form within groundwater are predominantly controlled by the prevailing redox (Eh) and acidity/alkalinity (pH) conditions.  As an example, the stable form of iron in oxidised groundwater (Eh>~1mV) is Fe3+ (ferric) at low (acidic) pH, while at higher (alkaline) conditions across most EH ranges insoluble ferric hydroxide forms and will tend to precipitate out of solution.  For mildly oxidising to mildly reducing conditions Fe2+ (ferrous) iron is stable at lower pHs, while Iron sulfide (pyrite) FeS2 and FeS are stable at neutral to alkaline conditions.  In reduced groundwater conditions (Eh<=-0.6mV) the stable form is Fe0.  Therefore a change in Eh/pH conditions, such as the introduction of oxygenated groundwater to reduced water in the presence of pyrite, or where ferric hydroxide comes into contact with reducing substances, will cause iron be taken into solution (i.e. dissolved), or vice versa cause iron to precipitate out of solution.

An example of a non-metallic element where Eh/Ph conditions also determine the stable form in contaminant hydrogeology is arsenic.   The stable forms in groundwater are arsenate (As5+) in oxygenated (Eh>0mV) water, generally strongly absorbed and Arsenite (As3+) in reduced water (Eh<0mV).  Dissolved arsenic can be absorbed by ferric hydroxides which are stable over a wide range of Eh/pH conditions and hence arsenic mobility is limited, although reducing conditions tend to increase mobility due to ferric hydroxide being taken into solution, with maximum mobility in mildly reducing conditions in the absence of hydrogen sulfide. Similar controls exist for common metal contaminants, including Al, Cr, Cu, Mn, and Pb

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

In contaminant hydrogeology assessments, VOCs do not have any single definition, but can include any organic (carbon containing) compound that is volatile or tends to vaporise under normal conditions, or has a boiling point (BP) between 50-250oC (Health Canada) or have a BP<250oC and can do damage to visual or audible senses (European Union), or any carbon compound that undergoes atmospheric photochemical reactions (USEPA) or has a Henry’s Law Constant >= 1×10-5 atm-m3/mol (USEPA, OSWER 2002). They are commonly used as fuels, solvents, scents, chemical precursors or markers, propellants, refrigerants, drugs, pesticides.  Examples which we look for in contaminant hydrogeology studies include:

• Trihalomethanes (THMs); e.g. chloroform (solvent/refrigerant) & brominated/chlorinated methane (formed as by-products of water disinfection using chlorine in the presence of naturally occurring organic material
• Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (MAHs); e.g. BTEX, in petroleum and c25% in diesel, also widely used as solvents
• Volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons (VCH); e.g.: 11DCE, chloroform, 111TCA, TCE, carbon tetrachloride (or tetrachloromethane, dry cleaning fluid), PCE (i.e. typically industrial solvents), 135 Trimethylbenzene (diesel component), vinyl chloride (VC; industrial chemical in PVC, plastics, rubber et al)
• Methyl Tert Butyl Ether (MTBE); formerly used as a petroleum additive (‘anti-knock’)

In contaminant hydrogeology assessments VOCs will exist in multiple phases, dissolved within groundwater, in the vapour phase as interstitial soil gases, and be adsorbed within the soil.  The accumulation of soil vapours in the vadose (unsaturated) zone beneath buildings may lead to potentially toxic or explosive concentrations in conditions of poor ventilation.  Remedial measures often seek to volatilise dissolved VOCs and then extract the soil gas under vacuum.  Dissolved phase contaminants may sorb onto the surfaces of aquifer materials, particularly those with high surface areas such as fine sands/silts and clays, and tend to have an affinity for organic carbon and also ferrous iron (FeII).  This tends to limit the mobility of the contaminant in comparison with groundwater, which behaviour may be expressed partially in the octanol/water partitioning coefficient (Kow) of the compound; contaminants with very high Kow, e.g. the PAH dibenz(a,h)anthracene (1,668,800, an SVOC) will be practically immobile, while low Kow compounds, e.g. benzene (97) will be relatively mobile.  VOCs will be variably susceptible to other degradation process, including photodegradation and hydrolysis (the splitting of water molecules into hydrogen & hydroxide ions).

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Semi-Volatile Compounds (SVOCs)

In contaminant hydrogeology studies SVOCs are defined as a subset of VOCs with a boiling point (BP)>100oC (USEPA), or may simply be defined as having a relatively lower volatility than VOCs.  Examples which we look for in contaminant hydrogeology assessments include:

• Carbamates: insecticides (e.g. propoxur (‘Baygon’), bendiocarb, methomyl)
• Chloral hydrate: medicine, manufacture of DDT
• Common herbicides (e.g. aldrin, atrazine, azinophos-methyl, BHC, carbaryl, chlordane, chlorpyrifos, DDT/E/D, endosulfan, endrin, fenitrothion, methoxychlor, permethrin, simazine et al)
• Chlorinated benzenes & chlorinated naphthalenes
• Chloroethanes (e.g. ethyl chloride, chemical manufacture, refrigerant, insecticide)
• Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK); industrial solvent for lacquers, adhesives, inks, typically present in industrial wastewater
• Perchloric acid (PCA): explosive manufacture
• Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); e.g. arachlor 1242 et al, formerly used in transformer fluids, highly toxic & persistent (i.e. resistant to degradation) in the environment
• Phthalates: esters of phthalic acid, e.g. di-2 ethyl P (DHEP), diisodecyl P (DIDP), diisonyl P (DINP) & Benylbutyl P (BBP)et al, used as plasticizers for PVC, also as stabilisers, lubricants, emulsifying agents et al.  They are reported endocrine disruptors, and may be linked to obesity in humans, although they are non-human carcinogens   They undergo photo & bio-degradation in air and also anaerobically
• Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), e.g. anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, fluoranthene, naphthalene, phenanthrene et al.  These occur naturally in oils/coal/tar, but are also produced during incomplete fuel combustion.  They may be present in solution in groundwater, absorbed in soils, and also present in soil gases/vapours. They are persistent (resistant to degradation) but often retarded or immobile, & may be retained within soils.  They are one of the most toxic components of fuels/ oils at low concentrations, with some species known carcinogens, mutagens (genetic mutations) and teratogens (foetus malformation).  .
• Synthetic pyrethroids:  insecticides, e.g. bifenthrin, permethrin et al.  Persistent and toxic to fish.

In contaminant hydrogeology studies, SVOCs will exhibit similar behaviour within groundwater to VOCs, although being less volatile will have a lower tendency to partition into soil vapours.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Nutrients

Nutrients analysed in groundwater in contaminant hydrogeology assessments include:

• Nitrogen: Total nitrogen, nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia (NH3)
• Phosphorous: Total phosphorous, filterable reactive phosphorous (FRP), soluble reactive phosphorous (SRP)

Nitrogen is present naturally in groundwater due to atmospheric exchange with recharge water, biological processed involving bacteria, algae and nitrogen fixing plants (legumes); nitrogen oxide (NOX) is present in the atmosphere from the burning of coal and petrol.  Its presence in elevated concentrations in groundwater is typically from fertiliser applications in agriculture, via nitrification into NO3 and NO2.  Nitrite, ammonia and Kjeldahl nitrogen (associated with organic nitrogen/ blood/ animal products etc) are unstable in aerated groundwater and are normally considered to indicate pollution associated with e.g. wastewater effluent, septic tanks, animal wastes etc. Typical background (i.e. unpolluted) concentrations of NO3 in streams and groundwater would be around <5-10mg/L.  The consumption of excess nitrate in drinking water is associated with methaemoglobin (‘blue-baby’) in infants, with the ADWG set at 50mg/L as NO3 for children< 3-months old; older children and adults may tolerate up to 100mg/L as NO3.

In contaminant hydrogeology assessments phosphorous may be present naturally in groundwater through the dissolution of phosphorous containing minerals (e.g. apatite, fluorite).  Anthropogenic sources include run-off from mining of phosphorate deposits and calcium phosphate fertiliser applications in agriculture, and it’s used in detergents.  It is a common within sewage as an animal metabolite.  It is responsible for causing algal blooms in rivers and the eutrophication (oxygen depletion).   It is present in both dissolved and particulate form in groundwater, with its stable form controlled by pH; in acidic waters as phosphoric acid, and in alkaline waters as orthophosphate (PO43-), with the concentration controlled by adsorption and co-precipitation.  Phosphorous is a strong complexing agent for some metals which are then retained in solution.  Typical background (i.e. unpolluted) concentrations of PO4 in streams and groundwater would be around <1mg/L.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Biological Contaminants in Groundwater

In contaminant hydrogeology studies, human and animal wastes enter groundwater through breakdowns in sewerage and animal waste disposal and should be considered in a contaminant hydrogeology assessment.  They may be present in domestic water sourced as raw water from bores (not recommended as a source of potable water by DoW), or from improper or ineffective treatment of raw water sources prior to entering supply. Bacterial infections in humans from Escherichia (or E.) Coli and coliform bacteria usually require very high numbers of organisms to be present in the system. Bacteria can be largely removed by water treatment and disinfection, usually via chlorination or less frequently ozonation.  The ADWG for E. Coli and Thermotolerant bacteria is zero.  Within the groundwater environment, bacteria usually only survive for <=c50-days, and this has lead to the concept of ‘sanitary zones’ around wellheads, equivalent to the 50-day groundwater time of travel distance, within which landuses which may generate bacterial wastes, such as animal husbandry are not permitted.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Radioactivity

In contaminant hydrogeology studies, radioactivity (the release or energy and energetic particles) may be naturally occurring in groundwater through the dissolution of radioactive minerals, including Cobalt-60, Iodine-131, Potassium-40, Radium, Radon, Rubidium-87, Strontium-89 , 90, Thorium-232, Uranium-238 (main source of groundwater radioactivity), and U235 (actinium series).  Decay products go via several daughter products with various half-lives (T1/2, the time taken to decay to half of the previous concentration) of days to millions of years to e.g. stable lead.  Uranium is soluble in groundwater as the uranyl ion UO22+ at high (alkaline) conditions, its stable form and concentration is dependent on the Eh/pH conditions similar to metals.  Radon 222, with T1/2 of 3.8 days is a radioactive gas produced from the decay of radium, which is produced naturally in granitic terrains and may be present is he dissolved phase in groundwater and also within soil gases, which may accumulate in poorly ventilated buildings and may constitute a significant human health hazard.

In contaminant hydrogeology assessments, specific radionuclides may serve useful purposes.  Tritium is naturally occurring in small quantities; however it was produced in large quantities by atmospheric nuclear explosions.  It has a T1/2 of 12.3 years, which makes it ideal as a ‘tracer’ for the movement of recharge water through the vadose zone to groundwater.  Carbon-14 is a radioactive isotope produced by cosmic rays with a T1/2 of 5,730 years, which also allows its use in groundwater recharge studies (e.g. BHPB PROJECT).  Other ‘dating’ radionuclides in groundwater studies include Chlorine-36, with T1/2 of 308,000 years.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Emerging Contaminants

Recent USGS studies in 2009 identified the following compounds associated with pharmaceuticals, personal care products & human & animal wastes at low concentrations in a variety of groundwater bores & streams which make them emerging contaminants in the field of contaminant hydrogeology:

• Insecticides: e.g. N,N-diethyltoluamide (insect repellent)
• Industrial chemicals: e.g. 1,4-dioxane (industrial solvent stabilizer), phthalates (plasticizers)
• Fuel additives: e.g. MTBE & TBA (oxygenates)
• Disinfection by-products: e.g. N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), also rocket propellant, solvent, rubber accelerator
• Plastics manufacture: e.g. bisphenol A (plastic- and epoxy-manufacturing ingredient)
• Fire retardants: e.g. polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), e.g. dibromophenyl ether, and tri(2-chloroethyl) phosphate
• Pharmaceuticals: (antibiotics/ drugs) e.g. sulfamethoxazole (veterinary and human antibiotic), carbamazepine
• Personal care products: e.g. (polycyclic musks),
• pesticides/herbicides: e.g. 1,2,3-trichloropropane
• Detergents: e.g. 4-octylphenol monoethoxylate (detergent metabolite).
• Metabolites  (produced by living organisms): e.g. cotinine (from nicotine), and 1,7-dimethylxanthine (from caffeine)

The US Department of Defence MERIT (Materials of Evolving Regulatory Interest Team) recognises the following emerging contaminants relevant to contaminant hydrogeology:

• ‘Watch list’: NDMA, 1,4-Dioxane (solvent, textiles, dye, detergent, fumigant) 1,2,3-TCP (trichloropropane, a persistent mobile contaminant in groundwater, used as a chemical intermediate, solvent, degreaser), nanomaterials, dintrotoluene (DNT), used in organic synthesis, dyes, explosives, and PBDEs
• ‘Action list’: perchlorate (rocket propellant), RDX (cyclonite, explosive), and TCE (degreasing solvent)

Other emerging contaminants may include human hormones within raw and treated water used for potable purposes.

Contaminant Hydrogeology: Remediation

Groundwater remediation in contaminant hydrogeology assessments is an enormous topic in its own right.  However, the mere presence of potentially hazardous ‘contaminants’ in groundwater may not pose an unacceptable risk where there is no complete linkage or pathway (e.g. via migration, abstraction, volatilisation (to soil gases) or discharge to an exposed population, which may include human consumption, recreational use, other usage (e.g. irrigation, industrial use, animal stock) or to the ecological environment via discharge to water bodies (e.g. wetlands, rivers, lakes or the marine environment).  If a risk assessment process determines that there is an unacceptable risk, then preventative management will be required.

In contaminant hydrogeology studies, remediation may be passive (e.g. monitored natural attenuation) or active (e.g. ‘pump and treat’, vacuum extraction et al), in-situ (e.g. air sparging, permeable reactive barriers et al).  The appropriate remedial strategy will depend on the contaminants present, the risk that they represent, the population to be protected, the extent of protection required, the hydrogeological environment and its sensitivity, and the acceptable timescale for clean-up.  Our current series of newsletters are reviewing appropriate remedial strategies for a variety of contaminants and applicable remedial technologies.

Sources:
Fetter, C.W.  Contaminant Hydrogeology
Groundwater Association of California
Hawley’s Condensed Chemical Dictionary
Hem, J.D.  Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water.
Lloyd, J.W. and Heathcote, J.A.  Natural inorganic hydrochemistry in relation to groundwater
National Health and Medical Research Council, Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council.  Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)
Shineldecker, C.L. Handbook of environmental contaminants: a guide for site assessment
United States Geological Survey
Wiedemeier, T.H. ed.  Natural attenuation of fuels and chlorinated solvents in the subsurface.

Stuart Jeffries and Lekha Siraz, Hydrosolutions Pty Ltd.


via Hydrosolutions | Groundwater and Environmental Consultants http://hydrosolutions.com.au